(ADINSERTER AMP)
Wednesday, September 28, 2022
HomePediatrics DentistryBreast lesions associated with mammographic architectural distortion: a study of 588 core...

Breast lesions associated with mammographic architectural distortion: a study of 588 core needle biopsies


  • Sickles, E. A. et al. in ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5.a edn. (American College of Radiology, 2013).

  • Berg, W. A. & Leung, J. (eds). Diagnostic Imaging: Breast, 3rd edn. (Elsevier, 2019).

  • Partyka, L., Lourenco, A. P. & Mainiero, M. B. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience. Am. J. Roentgenol. 203, 216–222 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ray, K. M., Turner, E., Sickles, E. A. & Joe, B. N. Suspicious findings at digital breast tomosynthesis occult to conventional digital mammography: imaging features and pathology findings. Breast J. 21, 538–542 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Durand, M. A., Wang, S., Hooley, R. J., Raghu, M. & Philpotts, L. E. Tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion: management algorithm with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 36, 311–321 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rochat, C. J., Baird, G. L. & Lourenco, A. P. Digital mammography stereotactic biopsy versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided biopsy: differences in biopsy targets, pathologic results, and discordance rates. Radiology 294, 518–527 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onega, T. et al. Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 13, e72–e79 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bahl, M., Lamb, L. R. & Lehman, C. D. Pathologic outcomes of architectural distortion on digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 209, 1162–1167 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alshafeiy, T. I. et al. Outcome of architectural distortion detected only at breast tomosynthesis versus 2D mammography. Radiology 288, 38–46 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hortobagyi, et al. in AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th edn. (Springer International Publishing, 2017).

  • Fitzgibbons, P. L. et al. Protocol for the examination of resection specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast (version 4.3.0.2; posted February 2020). (College of American Pathologists Available from cap.org., 2020).

  • Venkatesan, A., Chu, P., Kerlikowske, K., Sickles, E. A. & Smith-Bindman, R. Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology 250, 648–657 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bahl, M., Baker, J. A., Kinsey, E. N. & Ghate, S. V. Architectural distortion on mammography: correlation with pathologic outcomes and predictors of malignancy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 205, 1339–1345 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vijapura, C., Yang, L., Xiong, J. & Fajardo, L. L. Imaging features of nonmalignant and malignant architectural distortion detected by tomosynthesis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 211, 1397–1404 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pujara, A. C., Hui, J. & Wang, L. C. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management. Clin. Imaging 54, 133–137 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walcott-Sapp, S., Garreau, J., Johnson, N. & Thomas, K. A. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate. Am. J. Surg. 217, 857–861 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ambinder, E. B. et al. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate: a retrospective review. Am. J. Roentgenol. 217, 845–854 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weiss, A. et al. Validation study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Bancer. JAMA Oncol. 4, 203–209 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lopez, J. K. & Bassett, L. W. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, US, and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 29, 165–176 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sekine, K. et al. DCIS showing architectural distortion on the screening mammogram—comparison of mammographic and pathological findings. Breast Cancer 14, 281–284 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verkooijen, H. M. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int. J. Cancer 99, 853–859 (2002).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Parikh, J. & Tickman, R. Image-guided tissue sampling: where radiology meets pathology. Breast J. 11, 403–409 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Son, E. J. et al. Imaging-histologic discordance after sonographically guided percutaneous breast biopsy: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37, 1771–1778 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Poole, B. B. et al. Malignancy rates after surgical excision of discordant breast biopsies. J. Surg. Res. 195, 152–157 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jen, A. et al. Predictive value of mammographic architectural distortion and correlates identified on US and MRI. (SBI/ACR Breast Imaging Symposium, 2021).

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments