Sickles, E. A. et al. in ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5.a edn. (American College of Radiology, 2013).
Berg, W. A. & Leung, J. (eds). Diagnostic Imaging: Breast, 3rd edn. (Elsevier, 2019).
Partyka, L., Lourenco, A. P. & Mainiero, M. B. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience. Am. J. Roentgenol. 203, 216–222 (2014).
Ray, K. M., Turner, E., Sickles, E. A. & Joe, B. N. Suspicious findings at digital breast tomosynthesis occult to conventional digital mammography: imaging features and pathology findings. Breast J. 21, 538–542 (2015).
Durand, M. A., Wang, S., Hooley, R. J., Raghu, M. & Philpotts, L. E. Tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion: management algorithm with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 36, 311–321 (2016).
Rochat, C. J., Baird, G. L. & Lourenco, A. P. Digital mammography stereotactic biopsy versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided biopsy: differences in biopsy targets, pathologic results, and discordance rates. Radiology 294, 518–527 (2020).
Onega, T. et al. Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 13, e72–e79 (2016).
Bahl, M., Lamb, L. R. & Lehman, C. D. Pathologic outcomes of architectural distortion on digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 209, 1162–1167 (2017).
Alshafeiy, T. I. et al. Outcome of architectural distortion detected only at breast tomosynthesis versus 2D mammography. Radiology 288, 38–46 (2018).
Hortobagyi, et al. in AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th edn. (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
Fitzgibbons, P. L. et al. Protocol for the examination of resection specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast (version 220.127.116.11; posted February 2020). (College of American Pathologists Available from cap.org., 2020).
Venkatesan, A., Chu, P., Kerlikowske, K., Sickles, E. A. & Smith-Bindman, R. Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables. Radiology 250, 648–657 (2009).
Bahl, M., Baker, J. A., Kinsey, E. N. & Ghate, S. V. Architectural distortion on mammography: correlation with pathologic outcomes and predictors of malignancy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 205, 1339–1345 (2015).
Vijapura, C., Yang, L., Xiong, J. & Fajardo, L. L. Imaging features of nonmalignant and malignant architectural distortion detected by tomosynthesis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 211, 1397–1404 (2018).
Pujara, A. C., Hui, J. & Wang, L. C. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management. Clin. Imaging 54, 133–137 (2019).
Walcott-Sapp, S., Garreau, J., Johnson, N. & Thomas, K. A. Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate. Am. J. Surg. 217, 857–861 (2019).
Ambinder, E. B. et al. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate: a retrospective review. Am. J. Roentgenol. 217, 845–854 (2021).
Weiss, A. et al. Validation study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Bancer. JAMA Oncol. 4, 203–209 (2018).
Lopez, J. K. & Bassett, L. W. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, US, and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 29, 165–176 (2009).
Sekine, K. et al. DCIS showing architectural distortion on the screening mammogram—comparison of mammographic and pathological findings. Breast Cancer 14, 281–284 (2007).
Verkooijen, H. M. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int. J. Cancer 99, 853–859 (2002).
Parikh, J. & Tickman, R. Image-guided tissue sampling: where radiology meets pathology. Breast J. 11, 403–409 (2005).
Son, E. J. et al. Imaging-histologic discordance after sonographically guided percutaneous breast biopsy: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37, 1771–1778 (2011).
Poole, B. B. et al. Malignancy rates after surgical excision of discordant breast biopsies. J. Surg. Res. 195, 152–157 (2015).
Jen, A. et al. Predictive value of mammographic architectural distortion and correlates identified on US and MRI. (SBI/ACR Breast Imaging Symposium, 2021).